Whenever I show people my macro work, they inevitably ask how I did it and what lenses I used when I created the images. I have two macro lenses that I use — the Canon 100mm macro USM and the MP-E 65mm. While they are both macro lenses, that’s about where the similarity ends. The two lenses are very different in terms of how they are used and the images that they produce.
Canon 100mm USM*
The 100mm macro lens can act as both a macro lens and a “conventional” prime lens. I use this lens for both close-up work and as a multi-purpose lens. It can focus on objects as close as a few centimeters from the lens or to infinity. For example, both of the images below were taken with the 100mm macro lens.

(Canon XSi, 100mm macro lens, f/4, 1/1250, ISO 400)

(Canon XSI, 100mm macro lens, f/32, 30 seconds, ISO 100)
As you can see, the lens can be used for different types of photography. It’s not exclusively a macro lens.
Canon MP-E 65mm
This lens is a whole different beast from the 100mm macro lens. The lens is as different from the 100mm lens as night is different than day.
- The 100mm lens above can be used for many different types of photography. The MP-E 65 can only be used for macro photography. To be able to focus on your subject, it has to be thisclose to the lens. The lens cannot focus on anything that is more than a few centimeters away.
- The 100mm lens has automatic focus. The MP-E, on the other hand, is manual focus only. Furthermore, there is no focus ring on this lens. The only way to focus on your subject is to either move the camera or move the subject. This can sometimes be very frustrating when you’ve set up your shot and look through the viewfinder only to find that the focus is off just a little bit.
- The 100mm lens goes to f/32, giving you an opportunity for great depth of field (the stream picture above was taken at f/32). The MP-E 65 only goes to f/16 — and even at f/16, the depth of field can sometimes be wafer-thin. It’s not uncommon to find a picture produced by the MP-E 65 where the front of the subject is in focus, but the back is out of focus.
- The 65mm lens eats up light. While they both open as wide as f/2.8, the 100mm macro lens can do some nice work in low light. With the MP-E 65, you need to have lots of light, especially as you push it towards it’s maximum capabilities.
So, with all that said, you might wonder why anyone would want to use the MP-E 65mm lens. What can it do that the 100mm can’t that would justify the additional headaches that you encounter when using this lens?
The answer lies in one word: magnification. The maximum magnification you can achieve with the 100mm lens is 1:1. That is to say, the lens will take the image at life size, but no larger. The MP-E, on the other hand, can magnify your subject up to five times. For example, take a look at this shot:

(Canon XSi, MPE-65mm lens, f/8, 1/20, ISO 800, 3x magnification)
That fly was actually quite small. I could not have gotten this sort of shot with the 100mm lens — it simply would not magnify the subject as this lens does. This lens, once you learn to use it properly (something that I am still learning to do), will produce fantastic images that the 100mm lens cannot even dream of producing.

(Canon XSi, MP-E 65mm, f/16, 30 seconds, ISO 400, 4x magnification)
I took this shot of a clove on the first day that I owned the 65mm lens, just to see what the MP-E 65 was capable of. Needless to say, I was amazed at how I could magnify the images. A grain of rice could fill up the entire sensor. You simply cannot do that with the 100mm lens.
So, which should you buy? Well, as always, it depends. Consider the following differences when making your choice:
| Feature |
Canon 100mm USM |
Canon MP-E 65mm |
| Uses |
Many |
Dedicated macro lens |
| Focus |
Auto |
Manual |
| Difficulty |
Easy to use |
Steep learning curve |
| Lighting |
Easy to use in various lighting situations |
Needs lots of light, especially at higher magnifications |
| Maximum Magnification |
1:1 |
5:1 |
I will add one minor point: I’ve been interested in macro photography for quite a while. The 100mm macro lens was the first lens that I bought for my camera (after the kit lens which came with the camera). Using the 100mm lens gave me a great opportunity to learn to do macro work with a lens that was relatively easy to use. Had I first started with the 65mm lens, I might have become so frustrated with the difficulty of the lens that I might have given up on macro work altogether.
Zev
* Please note that there is now a newer version of this lens that is now classified as an L (luxury) lens. My lens is the older non-L lens, but it performs quite well.